Page 1 of 1

Nathaniel Mills or Not

Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 3:41 pm
by oel
Hi,
Image
Image

Found this for sale. I never have seen a Nathaniel Mills Castle top silver basket before. It has an engraved view of Buckingham Palace on the base, the sides embossed with scrolls and flowers. According to the seller; Nathaniel Mills, Birmingham, 1850. 6" (15.2cm) diameter, 4.25" (10.8cm) high, 2.9 troy ounces (90.75g).
Looking at the basket and the marks I am getting suspecious and I believe the marks are fake, the quality poor and made yesterday.
Like to hear your opinion.


Peter

Re: Nathaniel Mills or Not

Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 4:07 pm
by dognose
Hi Peter,

It's always difficult to judge from photos alone, but initially I see nothing of concern.

Are there any signs of wear at all?

Trev.

Re: Nathaniel Mills or Not

Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 4:55 pm
by oel
Hi Trev, I am judging looking at the two same images. To me the lion passant and the head of Victoria do not look right, the oval shield of Victoria is weird.
I compare with:
http://www.silvermakersmarks.co.uk/Date ... -1874.html
1850


Peter.

Re: Nathaniel Mills or Not

Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2018 3:34 am
by juantotree
Hi

The circular piece with the castle top engraving looks like it has been made separately and added to the basket. If this is the case has it been mounted like a coin, or is it soldered in at the back?

Martin

Re: Nathaniel Mills or Not

Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2018 4:47 am
by silvermakersmarks
The hallmark looks OK to me, Peter. I have seen minor distortions of the punch shapes on other pieces and in fact if you look at my example of the 1850 hallmark you will see that the duty mark punch shape is more circular than oval. In addition, if someone wanted to forge the hallmark why wouldn't they get everything right?

Phil

Image

Re: Nathaniel Mills or Not

Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2018 10:56 am
by oel
Thanks Phill, perhaps the appearance of the basket & marks looking brand new had me fooled.

Best,

Peter