
Might anyone have documentation on the left hand mark? Given the lack of hallmarks, might this indeed be a provincial duty dodger? TIA for any info!
SS
Yes, indeedy, snitched it from p.299 in Jackson's III.Did you get that picture from Jackson's? I've never seen any version of their mark quite like this, it's usually much neater and in plain capitals.
Yes, the actual mark is much better formed than the text reproduction, wonder what the story is.There's a nice clear image of the quatrefoil Williams mark here at ->
http://www.925-1000.com/dlExeter.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Thank you again for your response, Miles. No, this piece is in excellent condition with very little wear. The makers' mark is deeply struck and has the least bit of rubbing on the high points, the field shows the original matte finish. Any other marks, even if lightly struck, would be in evidence, IMO. The only other mark is the engraved "W" or "M" on the outside of the bow. Curiously, the monogram has the little tic marks that I more link to engraving done sixty years earlier. It is not expertly done, the curves that should be smooth show some kinks and directional changes. There is no other engraving, the piece is very plain. Maybe a Williams personal piece?Is it possible that the marks have worn away?