WHAT AGE COULD THIS BROOCH BE? new pic of back added
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 4:15 am
Recently bought this with two others from a family selling grandmothers things following her death. They said she had had them for 'ages' and they were greatly cherished by her.
The silver in this brooch is not that shiney blue toned silver - its soft and buttery looking with a vaguely yellow tinge. The stones are bright and very attractive.
The hallmarks are hard to read - with my eyesight dying even with a magnifying glass I cant get a clear image of the date stamp.
I have a picture here but my camera isnt the best for closeups Im sorry.
What I am sure is that the first mark is a diamond with WBS in it - the S could be a small s.
The second mark is a thistle in a shield.
The third mark is also in a shield and looks like a very simple stylised castle without embellishments visible and with three turrets, the middle being slightly taller.
Now this last mark is the one that kisses Polly - it is definitely in a square with no chopped corners although all corners are not perfect geometrically square right angles, Everyone I thrust the magnifying glass at agrees this is a letter 'f' - the trouble is, it looks just like the 1760 eff!
Could this possibly be this old, or has wear disguised a much younger piece of jewellery?
Is it very rare?
I would greatly appreciate if anyone could identify the makers mark - and therefore perhaps clarify the age of this very delicate and attractive brooch. Many thanks for your time. Kiwi jen


(click on thumbnails for a huge image)
A BETTER PIC OF THE HALLMARKS - especially if you have a laptop and can move the screen to darken it - any ideas on date folks? Thks

The silver in this brooch is not that shiney blue toned silver - its soft and buttery looking with a vaguely yellow tinge. The stones are bright and very attractive.
The hallmarks are hard to read - with my eyesight dying even with a magnifying glass I cant get a clear image of the date stamp.
I have a picture here but my camera isnt the best for closeups Im sorry.
What I am sure is that the first mark is a diamond with WBS in it - the S could be a small s.
The second mark is a thistle in a shield.
The third mark is also in a shield and looks like a very simple stylised castle without embellishments visible and with three turrets, the middle being slightly taller.
Now this last mark is the one that kisses Polly - it is definitely in a square with no chopped corners although all corners are not perfect geometrically square right angles, Everyone I thrust the magnifying glass at agrees this is a letter 'f' - the trouble is, it looks just like the 1760 eff!
Could this possibly be this old, or has wear disguised a much younger piece of jewellery?
Is it very rare?
I would greatly appreciate if anyone could identify the makers mark - and therefore perhaps clarify the age of this very delicate and attractive brooch. Many thanks for your time. Kiwi jen
(click on thumbnails for a huge image)
A BETTER PIC OF THE HALLMARKS - especially if you have a laptop and can move the screen to darken it - any ideas on date folks? Thks