Page 1 of 1
Jensen bracelet
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:19 pm
by paris
This is my 3rd time posting this. Hope I've got the rules right this time. If not, somebody please tell me what I'm doing wrong.
The markings show GJL with a superscript D (Georg Jensen), the lion facing left, the lion facing forward (London), and an italic lowercase "m" (1967).
It's a very pretty piece, and I'd like to know more about it, or if any of my information I found here is incorrect.
I also have a locket with the same markings minus the date. Should it be in a separate thread?
Thanx for any information.

Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:07 pm
by clown123
I believe that it is not Jensen and rather GJ Ltd of London: 1967 - 1977.
The Jensen mark has a pebble and the D has an underscore.
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:24 pm
by paris
Thank you, but I found this mark listed as Georg Jensen here. Is the information not correct?
http://www.925-1000.com/dlLondon4.html#M
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:43 pm
by clown123
That may well be true.
It's interesting because...
http://www.silvermakersmarks.co.uk/Make ... -G.html#GJ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
does not refer to Jensen specifically. Let's see what the experts say on the board... I'm curious.
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:06 pm
by admin
Hi,
Both of the GJ Ltd. marks illustrated on our website did come from, exported to Britain, Jensen pieces with additional Jensen, Denmark marks. However, the pieces of jewelry that you have illustrated are not Jensen designs, nor do they bear any resemblance to jewelry produced by Jensen during any period of the firm's long production history.
The only plausible explanations that immediately come to mind are:
1. This GJ Ltd. was an English firm that sponsored Jensen imports, as well as imports from other makers and coincidentally shared the same initials as Jensen (admittedly, this seems a stretch!)
2. It is Jensen Ltd. sponsor's mark and that the London branch of the Jensen firm was not above turning a profit through the import and sale of items by other foreign makers.
I don't doubt that there are other scenarios, but believe the second one is the likeliest.
Regards, Tom
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:21 pm
by paris
Are you saying these pieces might have been sold illegally?
It doesn't really matter to me if these pieces are Jensen or not, I just want to know who made them.
Maybe I'll dig deeper for the pattern. It surely must be called "chevron" on the bangle. My mother's aunt who owned them was from Exeter. I'll start there.
Thanx for responding.
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:30 pm
by admin
No, there is absolutely nothing illegal about sponsoring the import of foreign made items.
When an item only bears import marks and no marks from the maker or country of origin, there is no way to tell either what country it was imported from or its maker.
Regards, Tom
Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:56 pm
by rachelw
to me both the pendant and bracelet look nothing like any Georg Jensen designs. In fact they both look very English pieces. Just an opinion though!