Page 1 of 1

Gorham? Need help on mark please!

Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:18 pm
by expctngn
This is a pair of old real emerald earrings. The mark is on the small backing of the earring and I can only somewhat tell what it is by viewing it with the windows picture and fax viewer. The first link is the mark and the second is a view of the whole earrings. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I have spent hours and hours looking, for days. I don't wanna influence anyone's opinion on the picture but to me is seems like a lion facing right and a circle thing. I need expert eye's to view desperately. Thank you so much

wondering if it's gorham


http://i987.photobucket.com/albums/ae36 ... arring.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://i987.photobucket.com/albums/ae36 ... lds002.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
.

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 2:18 am
by JLDoggett
Is there a mark on the actual earring? I honestly could not read the marks on the ear-nut, but those need not be the one that origionally came with the earrings. A mark on the body of the earring would tell the maker.
.

Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 9:24 pm
by expctngn
No there is no mark at all on the earrings them self. I am assuming the backs are the originals as they are aged the same as the earrings. But yes I do not know if they are the original or not. since they are not marked, is there anything I can go on as to age? Would it mean they are older than when trademarks were required?
.

Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:34 pm
by JLDoggett
Quality stamping was required prior to 1900, and these look distinctly to be from the late 1020's through the late 1930's (if not later). Therefore they should have a quality make on them. One thing, they may have started off life as clip-ons or screw-backs wherein the mark would have been on the soldered on findings and lost when they were converted to posts.
.